June 8, 2009

More on the Government's Bailout of the UAW

Here's a good, if depressing, piece from Barron's about the government's bailout not of GM but of the UAW. The title says it all: "Big Wheels Keep on Rolling…Over Bondholders":

"The politically powerful united Auto Workers emerged with an exceptionally sweet deal in the proposed reorganization of a bankrupt General Motors -- and the taxpayer essentially is footing the bill. The federal government may be lucky to get back half of the $50 billion owed by GM, consisting of nearly $20 billion of existing loans and about $30 billion that Uncle Sam plans to extend through so-called debtor-in-possession financing in bankruptcy... The government effectively is making a gift to the UAW, because it is converting about $40 billion of its GM loans that are senior to the UAW claims into a 61% equity stake in the new company, making its recovery highly dependent on the new GM's equity value.

Read the entire piece here. If you want to see it pretty plainly, just look at this chart - especially the right column - to see how the UAW made out on this deal.

June 7, 2009

The Clueless Congress

Lest anyone believe that Congress does NOT operate in a bubble, consider the fact that the House Energy and Commerce Committee two weeks ago passed a sweeping climate change bill that for all its high-minded intentions will only drive up the cost of energy for manufacturers, businesses and consumers. And as the WaPo reports today, Obama and the Congress are full-speed ahead on a similarly sweeping health care proposal that now appears to have an employer mandate in there, and may end up eliminating the current tax exclusion for employers. Once again, the result will be greater cost on businesses and consumers.

This is all pretty standard Congressional fare until you stand back and realize that this is all taking place against a backdrop of what any Congressional leader (and the White House) will tell you is the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression. Everything they are doing on the climate and health care fronts will only make it harder for us to recover as a nation, and will end all hope that the US might lead the globe out of this current slump.

Maybe it's time Congress took a step back and thought about the world outside their bubble and the dual death blows they seem poised to deal to it.

June 1, 2009

The UAW's Ron Gettlefinger: Was He Lying Then Or Is He Lying Now?

We were reading the transcript of UAW President' Ron Gettlefinger's interview on the News Hour last week, where he was questioned by Paul Soman about their new agreement with GM. In the interview, Gettlefinger talks about their last two rounds of bargaining, saying in relevant part:

"RON GETTELFINGER: Well, I'm certainly not here touting it. It's a lifeline, is really what it's boiled down to. We would not have been in these negotiations.

And let me just step back and say that a light bulb went on in somebody's head, like they came up with a new idea in Washington when we were in those hearings, saying, you know, these companies are leveraged on their balance sheet.

Well, guess what? We knew that. We knew that in '03, and we started making movement in that direction. We knew that in '05. We made additional movements, mid-contract.

PAUL SOLMAN: Movements meaning?

RON GETTELFINGER: Meaning concessions in the contract, mid-contract in '05. We've made concessions again in '07, and we were moving along. (Emphasis ours)

That's funny -- because when the deal got done in '07, this is what Gettlefinger said on his website:

"The tentative agreement, reached at 3:05 a.m. Sept. 26, delivers solid economic gains for active and retired members, despite repeated attempts by GM to impose harsh takeaways

The agreement will deliver more than $13,000 in economic gains for a typical UAW member, including a $3,000 signing bonus, two 3 percent lump sums and a 4 percent lump sum.

Active workers will see their comprehensive health care coverage continue, with dental, hearing and other benefits improved. Retired workers will have their health benefits secured by a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association (VEBA), prefunded by GM with $29.9 billion in cash and other assets. The fund can only be used to pay retiree health benefits, and will remain solvent for decades regardless of the financial condition of GM.

The proposed contract will also deliver benefits to current and future retirees, with four lump-sum payments for current retirees, and a raise in basic benefit rates, the 30-and-out supplement, temporary and interim benefits for future retirees.

The company came into these talks looking to shred our contract to pieces,” said UAW Vice President Cal Rapson, who directs the UAW GM Department.

“But you can’t tear apart a group that stands together the way UAW members do.”

Guess not.

Let their be no mistake - the '07 agreement was not a "concessionary" agreement by any stretch of the word. The fact is, Gettelfinger and the UAW bargained like there was no tomorrow - literally. And for their sins -- along with plenty from the management side -- many will pay with their jobs. But even still, Gettlefinger has boasted that his employees will have no cuts in pay, benefits or pensions.

All this talk of concessions now in hindsight looks more like a fib and less like the truth. Comparing his earlier boasts of gains with his current cries of concessions, we are forced to ask the prosecutor's question:

Was he lying then or is he lying now?

'The Obama Infatuation'

Bob Samuelson nails it again in an op-ed in today's Washington Post under the above title. He cites a Pew Research Center Study on the topic -- which of course, received scant coverage. Here's the opening paragraph:

"The Obama infatuation is a great unreported story of our time. Has any recent president basked in so much favorable media coverage? Well, maybe John Kennedy for a moment, but no president since. On the whole, this is not healthy for America.

In his column two weeks ago about Obama's astronomical deficits, Samuelson hinted at this same theme:

Imagine hypothetically that a President McCain had submitted a budget plan identical to Obama's. There would almost certainly have been a loud outcry: "McCain's Mortgaging Our Future." Obama should be held to no less exacting a standard.

At the end of the day, the lack of skeptical coverage by the press-- as Samuelson says -- is "not healthy for America."

May 31, 2009

Ricci, et al. v. DeStefano: Sonia Sotomayor's Controversial Decision

There is so much more heat than light being shed on the controversial case decided by Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, as is typically the case with Supremer Court nominees post-Robert Bork. The Obama Administration ash dispatched its "spinners" to the talk shows to beat back criticism from the right about the case.

And so we just moseyed over to the Google and found this helpful site that lays the facts out pretty well. Just take a look through this fairly sterile recitation of the facts and then draw your own conclusions. The case had to do with white firefighters in New Haven (CT) denied promotions by the city after garnering top scores on a promotion test. All who garnered top scores were white, hence the hullabaloo.

In some ways, this is a perfect case around which to have this debate in America. These issues should be aired, not obfuscated.

May 27, 2009

The UAW, Fiddling While GM Burns

Just can't stop staring at this, from the Washington Post story on the GM bailout this morning:

"The union's cost-of-living increases, along with some holiday pay, were suspended. Yet UAW President Ronald A. Gettelfinger stressed that there would be no reduction in the membership's base hourly pay, health care and pensions...

Most of GM's hourly workers will receive another buyout and early retirement offer. Production workers will be offered $20,000, plus a $25,000 car voucher. Skilled employees will be offered $45,000 plus the vehicle voucher. The biggest buyout package, for employees with at least 20 years of service, includes $115,000 plus the car voucher." (Emphasis ours)blockquote>

Is this a group behaving like they work for a company that's about to go under....?

May 26, 2009

What's on the Employment Law Horizon?

Here's a good article from HRExecutive Online - based on their interview with the top employment lawyers in the country. It covers their collective expectations about what is on the horizon for the Obama Administration and what steps employers might take.

This (Still) Doesn't Seem Fair....

Further to our post of May 14, kudos to the WaPo, who is like a terrier with a bone on the issue of the blatant inequity in the government takeover of Chrysler and GM. They've now editorialized on it twice in a little under two weeks. In today's installment, entitled, "Government Motors," they point out once again the proposed haircut (more like a buzz cut) for the investors while the UAW gets a trim:

"While the Obama administration has been playing hardball with bondholders, it has been more than happy to play nice with the United Auto Workers. How else to explain why a retiree health-care fund controlled by the UAW is slated to get a 39 percent equity stake in GM for its remaining $10 billion in claims while bondholders are being pressured to take a 10 percent stake for their $27 billion?"

As the WaPo points out, this has become a political, not a financial, process. Good luck finding investors for other future adventures.

Go here to join an online manufacturing discussion on the topic.

May 14, 2009

Welcome, Manufacturing Crunch!

Is it possible to build a user-generated, online global manufacturing community? That's exactly what ManufacturingCrunch endeavors to do. Audacious, maybe, but worth a shot. You manufacturers out there (you know who you are), hope you'll check it out and join the discussion.

The weak of heart should avert their eyes...

This Doesn't Seem Fair....

The WaPo in its lead editorial today correctly (albeit gently) scolds the Obama Administration for a little uneven-handedness in dealing with the various Chrysler creditors during the Chapter 11 process. "President Obama may call them 'speculators,'" goes their sub-head, "but the economy needs private investors." Not likely, given the track record thus far, to wit:

"The government's intervention in GM's financial affairs tilts the scales so dramatically in the company's (read: government's) favor that it risks shutting out the legitimate interests of some creditors in favor of politically connected players who are owed much less and have less of a claim to the company's money. GM bondholders, for example, are being pushed to accept a 10 percent equity stake in repayment of their $27 billion in loans to the company. The United Auto Workers, on the other hand, is being offered a 35 percent equity stake in exchange for its claim of roughly $10 billion -- a claim that would typically be wiped out in bankruptcy.

While the hedge funds are likely to receive less than 30 cents on the dollar, a health-care fund controlled by the UAW is being handed a 55 percent ownership stake in Chrysler. If bankruptcy rules had been strictly followed, the union would have been entitled to little, if any, return.

Extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures, and it was with this thought in mind that we endorsed the federal government's decision to pump billions of dollars into the automakers. But the spectacle of creditors being stripped of their legal rights in favor of a labor union with which the president is politically aligned does little to attract private capital at a time when the government and many companies need these investors the most."

Holding the UAW harmless while dinging the investors is a lousy way to run a railroad - or a car company. Over time, this will come back to bite the Administration - and Chrysler's' proud new majority owners, the UAW. The UAW shares the blame for the sorry state of the auto industry.They can only kick the can down the road so far before they will have to come to grips with what they have wrought.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Categories

About

Pat Cleary is Senior VP of Digital Public Affairs at a leading public affairs firm in Washington, where he helps corporations and associations drive their message through new media channels. Before this, he spent 10 years at the National Association of Manufacturers(NAM)in a series of senior policy, public affairs and communications posts. He started ShopFloor.org, a popular business blog, growing it to a million readers in 2006. Pat has also held a number of policy assignments at the U.S. Department of Labor and the National Mediation Board, the latter of which he chaired. His areas of expertise include human resources issues, health care, economics and trade. He is the author of "The Negotiation Handbook."

Everything posted on this blog is my personal opinion and does not necessarily represent the views of my employer or its clients.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33